#Framer sites cms full

The ETF “has the same problem as everyone else, eased somewhat by having the majority of its money in robotics, rather than AI.

The biggest is BOTZ, the Global X Robotics and AI ETF, which had the 19th-largest inflows of any ETF tracked by FactSet in the past month, despite not even making the top 100 by size.” Wow, so much money flowing into a small ETF! What about other companies? “The struggle to find places to invest shows up in the AI exchange-traded funds. Nvidia has to not only win from the AI rush but win really, really big-merely to justify where the shares are already.” But Nvidia stock is already up 160% this year, and it trades at 44 times estimates of 12-month forward earnings-even after analysts doubled their estimates. Who will be the winners from AI developments? The obvious candidate is #Nvidia, whose chips are the picks and shovels of the AI gold rush. The other problem “for the would-be AI investor, there are few listed companies dedicated to AI. As with the much larger dot-com bubble, or the more recent mini-bubbles in 3-D printing, clean technology, cryptocurrencies, cannabis stocks and SPACs, it will last as long as the hype lasts, then dissipate. In discussing the current bubble, he says: “the odds are that the #AI #hype is just that, once again. The author argues that “AI has certainly been overhyped before.” It “reached new highs in 2010, when IBM’s Watson system was reported to be capable of beating humans at quiz show “Jeopardy!” IBM’s stock surged as Watson went on to win the contest in 2011, and was launched commercially-but IBM shares have plunged more than a third since peaking shortly thereafter.” The second is a dearth of places to invest, leading to some extraordinary stock surges.” #experience #work #simpledesign #designadvice #musicĪrticle emphasizes two problems faced by investors wanting to ride the wave of AI hype: “The first is that AI might once again be overhyped. Want more random thoughts, you can read more on Medium Something complex can sound, taste, and look very simple on the flip side, something that looks simple can actually be extremely complex. I use to cram as many ideas as possible into a single project, I thought simple was boring, but complex doesn't always = cool. This is a major shift from my previous approach. As creatives, we should be pursuing the idea of less but better not more but worse. It is easy to add more, but it takes skill, and confidence to show restraint. It is okay to add flourishes and your personal touches, everything we make should feel personal and beautiful to us but there is a fine line when enough is enough. When we try to add more for the sake of more it dilutes the very thing that is making the work great in the first place. The best music has one amazing riff and the other musicians add synergy behind it.

#Framer sites cms full

The best food is simple yet full of flavor. It is so simple when you think of it, but hard in practice. The best work often has just one or two core concepts where everything plays support to enhance the main theme. Now, with nearly a decade of experience behind me, I've come to realize that less is often more. If something was good, why not have as much of it as possible? I believed in the idea that more is always better. As a younger man (in my early 20s when I thought I knew everything),